Is someone able to review PR 40 / #2500 proposed fix?

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Is someone able to review PR 40 / #2500 proposed fix?

Stefan Richthofer
We still have an unreviewed PR https://github.com/jythontools/jython/pull/40 proposing a fix for #2500 (Loading default cacerts on client socket when specifying a default java truststore unnecessarily searches for more cacerts in the same dir).
I am not an expert for ssl.py and cannot sufficiently asses whether it can/should be applied, although it looks good to me (in my local experimentation branch it doesn't cause regrtest issues or so).

I think it would be a pity to miss a ready-made fix for 2.7.1/rc, so it would be nice if someone with more knowledge about ssl, cacerts etc could have a look and drop a note.


Best

Stefan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Jython-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-dev
Loading...