Is someone able to review PR 40 / #2500 proposed fix?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view

Is someone able to review PR 40 / #2500 proposed fix?

Stefan Richthofer
We still have an unreviewed PR proposing a fix for #2500 (Loading default cacerts on client socket when specifying a default java truststore unnecessarily searches for more cacerts in the same dir).
I am not an expert for and cannot sufficiently asses whether it can/should be applied, although it looks good to me (in my local experimentation branch it doesn't cause regrtest issues or so).

I think it would be a pity to miss a ready-made fix for 2.7.1/rc, so it would be nice if someone with more knowledge about ssl, cacerts etc could have a look and drop a note.



Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites,!
Jython-dev mailing list
[hidden email]