|
TL;DR ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox _______________________________________________ Jython-users mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users |
|
It is true that 2.2 is no longer maintained -- though if someone
(other than me) where interested enough to learn how to put together a 2.2 release with some simple updates I'd be open to discussing it. I'd probably even help :) Another possible avenue to your goals might be to look into how a minimal Jython 2.5.x could be built. Again I'm willing to give advice but I'm focused more on 2.6 and beyond. For my part I'm trying to get a 2.5.3 release together in the new mercurial world.... -Frank ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox _______________________________________________ Jython-users mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users |
|
In reply to this post by Chris Clark
fwierzbicki wrote:
> It is true that 2.2 is no longer maintained -- though if someone > (other than me) where interested enough to learn how to put together a > 2.2 release with some simple updates I'd be open to discussing it. I'd > probably even help :) I personally would love to see 2.2.X maintained and could probably be coerced into submitting a patch or two if it were. We still use 2.2 for the bytecode compiler, which we then obfuscate to protect our (non-OSS) IP. Roger Marquis ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox _______________________________________________ Jython-users mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users |
|
On 1/10/2012 11:17 PM, Roger Marquis wrote:
> fwierzbicki wrote: >> It is true that 2.2 is no longer maintained -- though if someone >> (other than me) where interested enough to learn how to put together a >> 2.2 release with some simple updates I'd be open to discussing it. I'd >> probably even help :) > I personally would love to see 2.2.X maintained and could probably be > coerced into submitting a patch or two if it were. We still use 2.2 for > the bytecode compiler, which we then obfuscate to protect our (non-OSS) > IP. > Thanks for the offer Frank. I can manage a few (python) patches but I'm not ready to take on release builds for Jython! I personally use Jython so I don't have to use Java/ant ;-) It makes deploying scripts/apps to friends/family very easy. Are any companies (on this mailing list) relying on Jython (2.2) for their commercial product? If so are you already performing release builds? Do you want Windows 7 support? Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Mar 27 - Feb 2 Save $400 by Jan. 27 Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2 _______________________________________________ Jython-users mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users |
|
In reply to this post by Roger Marquis
On Monday 2012-04-16 13:49 (-0700), Roger Marquis <[hidden email]> wrote:
> fwierzbicki wrote: >> It is true that 2.2 is no longer maintained -- though if someone >> (other than me) where interested enough to learn how to put together a >> 2.2 release with some simple updates I'd be open to discussing it. I'd >> probably even help :) > I personally would love to see 2.2.X maintained and could probably be > coerced into submitting a patch or two if it were. We still use 2.2 for > the bytecode compiler, which we then obfuscate to protect our (non-OSS) > IP. > Kinda of an old thread, there was some interest shown earlier for an updated 2.2 release. I had an itch recently and this was the result of the scratching.... https://bitbucket.org/clach04/jython/downloads I've a few very small patches to the 2.2 branch along with a script for applying them to a pre-built jython 2.2 jar file. I.e. I'm not building Jython to produce the new releases, I'm limiting myself to Python only changes. This adds Windows 7 support to Jython 2.2 (I snuck in some other things too, see the commit log). I ended up forking the Jython code so that it was obvious what the changes are. I'm not sure what the future is for this, it works for what I need it for :-) Roger - do you have any changes that you've made to Jython 2.2 that are worth sharing? Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 _______________________________________________ Jython-users mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users |
| Powered by Nabble | Edit this page |
