Need help review change that affect IPython/Emacs integration.

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Need help review change that affect IPython/Emacs integration.

Matthias Bussonnier
Hello list,

As you might know the current master of IPython is now using
Prompt-toolkit to provide crazy awesome multi line-editing, and
syntactic coloration.

Though it might have some effect with emacs python.el integration and
in particular the 'inferior shell' (whatever that is).

We'll appreciate any help on testing potential issues, see here:

https://github.com/ipython/ipython/pull/9399

So if you are or know any emacs user that have slightly more
competence[1] than us  to investigate the emacs side of things, we
would really appreciate for you/them to pitch in, and propagate the
message.

Thanks a lot for your help,
--
M

[1]: That is to say more than typing `emacs` and then wondering how
the hell to quit.
_______________________________________________
IPython-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Need help review change that affect IPython/Emacs integration.

Aaron Meurer
Some potentially useful information about this
https://www.masteringemacs.org/article/running-shells-in-emacs-overview.

Aaron Meurer

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Matthias Bussonnier
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hello list,
>
> As you might know the current master of IPython is now using
> Prompt-toolkit to provide crazy awesome multi line-editing, and
> syntactic coloration.
>
> Though it might have some effect with emacs python.el integration and
> in particular the 'inferior shell' (whatever that is).
>
> We'll appreciate any help on testing potential issues, see here:
>
> https://github.com/ipython/ipython/pull/9399
>
> So if you are or know any emacs user that have slightly more
> competence[1] than us  to investigate the emacs side of things, we
> would really appreciate for you/them to pitch in, and propagate the
> message.
>
> Thanks a lot for your help,
> --
> M
>
> [1]: That is to say more than typing `emacs` and then wondering how
> the hell to quit.
> _______________________________________________
> IPython-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev
_______________________________________________
IPython-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Need help review change that affect IPython/Emacs integration.

Stuart Mumford
Hello,

I am far from an advanced emacs user, but I have installed IPython 5.0b4
and prompt_toolkit 1.0.3 and when I run my inferior ipython shell, it
seems to "work" but no input prompt is shown (see attached screenshot).

If you can guide me on debugging and or testing patches I am happy to
help, but can not offer any insight on the emacs side.

Stuart


On 25/05/16 19:56, Aaron Meurer wrote:

> Some potentially useful information about this
> https://www.masteringemacs.org/article/running-shells-in-emacs-overview.
>
> Aaron Meurer
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Matthias Bussonnier
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Hello list,
>>
>> As you might know the current master of IPython is now using
>> Prompt-toolkit to provide crazy awesome multi line-editing, and
>> syntactic coloration.
>>
>> Though it might have some effect with emacs python.el integration and
>> in particular the 'inferior shell' (whatever that is).
>>
>> We'll appreciate any help on testing potential issues, see here:
>>
>> https://github.com/ipython/ipython/pull/9399
>>
>> So if you are or know any emacs user that have slightly more
>> competence[1] than us  to investigate the emacs side of things, we
>> would really appreciate for you/them to pitch in, and propagate the
>> message.
>>
>> Thanks a lot for your help,
>> --
>> M
>>
>> [1]: That is to say more than typing `emacs` and then wondering how
>> the hell to quit.
>> _______________________________________________
>> IPython-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev
> _______________________________________________
> IPython-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev

_______________________________________________
IPython-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev

Screenshot from 2016-06-24 09-59-28.png (44K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Need help review change that affect IPython/Emacs integration.

Thomas Kluyver-2
Are you using the --simple-prompt flag to instantiate IPython for the inferior shell?

On 24 June 2016 at 10:01, Stuart Mumford <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hello,

I am far from an advanced emacs user, but I have installed IPython 5.0b4
and prompt_toolkit 1.0.3 and when I run my inferior ipython shell, it
seems to "work" but no input prompt is shown (see attached screenshot).

If you can guide me on debugging and or testing patches I am happy to
help, but can not offer any insight on the emacs side.

Stuart


On 25/05/16 19:56, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> Some potentially useful information about this
> https://www.masteringemacs.org/article/running-shells-in-emacs-overview.
>
> Aaron Meurer
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Matthias Bussonnier
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Hello list,
>>
>> As you might know the current master of IPython is now using
>> Prompt-toolkit to provide crazy awesome multi line-editing, and
>> syntactic coloration.
>>
>> Though it might have some effect with emacs python.el integration and
>> in particular the 'inferior shell' (whatever that is).
>>
>> We'll appreciate any help on testing potential issues, see here:
>>
>> https://github.com/ipython/ipython/pull/9399
>>
>> So if you are or know any emacs user that have slightly more
>> competence[1] than us  to investigate the emacs side of things, we
>> would really appreciate for you/them to pitch in, and propagate the
>> message.
>>
>> Thanks a lot for your help,
>> --
>> M
>>
>> [1]: That is to say more than typing `emacs` and then wondering how
>> the hell to quit.
>> _______________________________________________
>> IPython-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev
> _______________________________________________
> IPython-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev


_______________________________________________
IPython-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev



_______________________________________________
IPython-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Need help review change that affect IPython/Emacs integration.

Stuart Mumford

That seems to have fixed it.


On 24/06/16 14:07, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
Are you using the --simple-prompt flag to instantiate IPython for the inferior shell?

On 24 June 2016 at 10:01, Stuart Mumford <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hello,

I am far from an advanced emacs user, but I have installed IPython 5.0b4
and prompt_toolkit 1.0.3 and when I run my inferior ipython shell, it
seems to "work" but no input prompt is shown (see attached screenshot).

If you can guide me on debugging and or testing patches I am happy to
help, but can not offer any insight on the emacs side.

Stuart


On 25/05/16 19:56, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> Some potentially useful information about this
> https://www.masteringemacs.org/article/running-shells-in-emacs-overview.
>
> Aaron Meurer
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Matthias Bussonnier
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Hello list,
>>
>> As you might know the current master of IPython is now using
>> Prompt-toolkit to provide crazy awesome multi line-editing, and
>> syntactic coloration.
>>
>> Though it might have some effect with emacs python.el integration and
>> in particular the 'inferior shell' (whatever that is).
>>
>> We'll appreciate any help on testing potential issues, see here:
>>
>> https://github.com/ipython/ipython/pull/9399
>>
>> So if you are or know any emacs user that have slightly more
>> competence[1] than us  to investigate the emacs side of things, we
>> would really appreciate for you/them to pitch in, and propagate the
>> message.
>>
>> Thanks a lot for your help,
>> --
>> M
>>
>> [1]: That is to say more than typing `emacs` and then wondering how
>> the hell to quit.
>> _______________________________________________
>> IPython-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev
> _______________________________________________
> IPython-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev


_______________________________________________
IPython-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev




_______________________________________________
IPython-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev


_______________________________________________
IPython-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev