Re: Is PEP 3333 the final solution for WSGI on Python 3?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Is PEP 3333 the final solution for WSGI on Python 3?

hidura
I did a solution based on the old PEP and works very well to me, i don't know if could be used by others if any are interested i can send it.

El , Graham Dumpleton <[hidden email]> escribió:

> Any one care to comment on my blog post?
>
>
>
>  http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2010/10/is-pep-3333-final-solution-for-wsgi-on.html
>
>
>
> As far as web framework developers commenting, Armin at:
>
>
>
>  http://www.reddit.com/r/Python/comments/du7bf/is_pep_3333_the_final_solution_for_wsgi_on_python/
>
>
>
> has said:
>
>
>
>  """Hopefully not. WSGI could do better and there is a proposal for
>
> that (444)."""
>
>
>
> So, looks he is very cool on the idea.
>
>
>
> No other developers of actual web frameworks has commented at all on
>
> PEP 3333 from what I can see.
>
>
>
> Graham
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Web-SIG mailing list
>
> [hidden email]
>
> Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
>
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/hidura%40gmail.com
>
_______________________________________________
Web-SIG mailing list
[hidden email]
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/lists%40nabble.com