If you're cross-subscribed with Diversity, you know I'm working to
recruit more truckers to Python (why should Java have all the fun
-- and Visual FoxPro seems to be fading).
No, this doesn't make me a "fossil fuels nut".**
Maybe some of those trucks are electric, like in the early 1900s (I've
been reading Edwin Black's 'Internal Combustion' so consider me
under the influence).
I thought this most recent NCTM geometry book:
Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making in Geometry
...was somewhat snarky to truckers, as the text protests the sign is
correct, in giving the right clearance. But that's not what the situation
calls for (what's the sign for, if not to prevent just such accidents?).
Here's what I'm talking about:
Mathematician Henry Pollak (2004) wondered why tractor trailers
often got stuck under a certain underpass when the maximum
clearance—the height from the roadway to the bridge—was
clearly labeled on a sign.
http://www.nctm.org/catalog/product.aspx?id=13525 (Read an Excerpt)
Nothing too original. Always appreciating Guido's slick
implementation of GCD (shorter than what's in MFTDA).
I'm also daring to use 'me' instead of 'self' for the name of the
instance handle. I see good pedagogical reasons for doing this,
including to provoke a first person point of view in object modeling
(i.e. "I am a..." versus "It is a..." -- as in "I'm a little teapot,
short and stout...", a good beginning for OO-style thinking).
I'm also showing off a Compose type the sole purpose of which is to
allow functions to be composed using the multiplication operator. I
have my reasons...